[Oficial] Intel Core "all" Series

[Jorge-Vieira]

os primeiros FX são do tempo dos 939. na altura em que a Amd estava por cima...

Esses esmagavam por completo o melhor dos Intel na altura, mas também não eram cpu´s acessíveis a qualquer um, eram cpu´s que andavam na ordem dos 900 a 1000€ cá por PT.

[Jorge-Vieira]

Intel Skylake-S com novo socket - Socket 1151

Intel’s upcoming Skylake-S 14nm CPUs are set to replace Intel’s Haswell refresh line some time next year, bringing with it a new socket, chipset and motherboards. The new socket is called LGA 1151 and has just one pin more than Haswell, Intel’s current generation architecture.
The new CPU will support both DDR4 1.2v and DDR3L 1.35V, it will be up to motherboard manufacturers to support one or the other. The chipset that will allow you to overclock the new CPUs is called Z170 and it comes with a 1 x 16 plus 2×8 or 1×8 plus 2×4 PCIe express 3.0 combination.

Ler o resto da noticia em:
http://www.kitguru.net/components/cp...a-1151-socket/

[LPC]

Intel Skylake-S com novo socket - Socket 1151



Ler o resto da noticia em:
http://www.kitguru.net/components/cp...a-1151-socket/

Boas!
Mais uma moedinha... Mais um socket...

Agora um transitório 1151 LOL...
Depois para o ano seguinte, novo socket 1152 já com DDR4 Apenas...

Entretanto é sempre a mandar boards e cpus para a sucata...

Cumprimentos,

LPC

[Jorge-Vieira]

Nada que não se tenha visto estes ultimos anos, tipico da Intel, novas mobos e novos sockets a cada lançamento de novidades.
Concorrencia a serio precisa-se.

[MTPS]

Nada que não se tenha visto estes ultimos anos, tipico da Intel, novas mobos e novos sockets a cada lançamento de novidades.
Concorrencia a serio precisa-se.

Não existe nem vai existir.

A AMD só pode competir no best-buy abaixo dos 150€, onde mete um octo-core ao preço do I3...

Precisa-se é dum mercado mais informado.

[tiran]

Também não é só o CPU...os Chipsets da AMD já estão quase a fazer 4 anos... Podiam fazer um refresh com pcie 3.0 controladores de sata melhores e tal... Actualizar um bocadinho as coisas...

Sim eu sei que não se ia notar muita diferença...mas modernizava um bocado...

[Jorge-Vieira]

Intel Skylake-S adiado até Setembro/Outubro de 2015

Intel Skylake-S processors were slated for arrival in June/July by all the leaks preceding this one, but now we have confirmation from various sources that Intel has shifted the processors launch to September/October 2015. That means that Skylake is approximately a year away.

Intel Skylake-S Processors Arriving on 37th to 47th Week of 2015

Ler a noticia completa em:
http://wccftech.com/intel-skylake-s-delayed-september-ctober-2015/

[Jorge-Vieira]

Intel Core-M com novos modelos

Barely two months after its launch, Intel's Core M family has already expanded. CPU-World has the goods on the new additions to the series, which all feature higher graphics clock speeds—and, in some cases, higher CPU clock speeds, as well.
Here they are next to the original members of the Core M family, which I've helpfully grayed out:

Model	Cores/ threads	Base clock (GHz)	Max Turbo clock (GHz)	L3 cache (MB)	IGP	Base/ max IGP speed (GHz)	Max memory speed (MT/s)	TDP (W)
Core M 5Y71	2/4	1.2	2.9	4	HD Graphics 5300	300/900	1600	4.5
Core M 5Y70	2/4	1.1	2.6	4	HD Graphics 5300	100/850	1600	4.5
Core M 5Y51	2/4	1.1	2.6	4	HD Graphics 5300	300/900	1600	4.5
Core M 5Y31	2/4	0.9	2.4	4	HD Graphics 5300	300/850	1600	4.5
Core M 5Y10c	2/4	0.8	2.0	4	HD Graphics 5300	300/800	?	4.5
Core M 5Y10a	2/4	0.8	2.0	4	HD Graphics 5300	100/800	1600	4.5
Core M 5Y10	2/4	0.8	2.0	4	HD Graphics 5300	100/800	1600	4.5

Base IGP clock speeds have tripled from 100 to 300MHz in all cases, and some of the newcomers have higher peak IGP speeds of 850 and 900MHz, as well. And Intel hasn't neglected CPU clock speeds. The Core M Core M 5Y71 has a 100MHz higher base speed and a 300MHz higher Turbo speed than the former flagship, the 5Y70. Also, the chipmaker has filled the gap between the 5Y10a and 5Y70 with some new options, the fastest of which is similar to the 5Y70 but with faster integrated graphics.

Ver noticia completa em:
http://techreport.com/news/27301/new...r-clock-speeds

[Jorge-Vieira]

Intel class-action settlement to pay those who purchased a Pentium 4 PC nearly 15 years ago

Did you purchase a computer powered by Intel’s Pentium 4 processor roughly 15 years ago? If so, you may be eligible to receive a cash payout of $15 as settlement in a long-running class-action lawsuit against Intel and HP.
The lawsuit alleges that Intel and HP manipulated benchmark scores for its Pentium 4 processor during the heated processor war with rival AMD.

So, who’s eligible to apply for compensation? The proposed settlement limits eligibility to residents of the United States (except those living in Illinois) who purchased a new computer equipped with a Pentium 4 processor between November 20, 2000 and June 30, 2002. The machine must have been purchased for personal family or household use.
The settlement works out to about a buck a year – not exactly a hefty bounty but money is money if you were affected.
It’s worth pointing out that both companies have denied these claims from the get-go but agreed to the settlement, perhaps just to be done with the whole fiasco. And in addition to paying claims to customers, Intel has agreed to donate $4 million to education non-profits as part of the settlement.
Fortunately, you won’t be required to come up with a receipt to prove you purchased a P4 system. Instead, class members will be required to sign the claim form under good faith and risk perjury if they aren’t truthful.
The deadline to submit a claim form is April 14, 2015.

http://www.techspot.com/news/58673-i...d-pentium.html

[Jorge-Vieira]

Intel Skylake - chipetset Z170, specs leaked

This leak comes courtesy of Fudzilla. They’ve got their hands on some more Skylake-s related platform specs. Fudzilla has been a consistently accurate source of leaks. So rest assured that what you’ll read here will materialize in some for or fashion next year.
.
The more we hear about Skylake-S the more we realize what a conflicting product this has been for Intel. We still expect to see both Broadwell and Skylake CPUs coexisting in 2015. Having two different CPU generations launch months within each other is unusual to say the least. But all of this can be traced back to Intel’s 14nm struggles. Had the 14nm process been on time Broadwell wouldn’t have needed to coexist with Skylake. because it would’ve been launched much earlier. Remember Intel had to release Haswell refresh parts only because Broadwell wasn’t ready.
Intel Introducing a New Socket and Chipset With Skylake

According to Fudzilla Skylake-S parts will replace non-K Haswell refresh parts. So although Intel will be introducing a new family of CPUs they’ll be very limited in terms of overclocking.
Skylake processors will require a new socket. LGA 1151 which has one additional pin compared to the current LGA 1150 socket. Skylake will supoort both DDR4 1.2v and DDR3L 1.35v. Apparently the motherboard makers will decide which memory architecture to support on each board. The motherboard will only support one type or the other, not both simultaneously.


Overclockable K-suffix CPUs will only be released in the Broadwell flavor. At leas initially, overclockable Skylake parts are still missing from Intel’s roadmap. One thing’s for sure though is that if they do come out it’ll be after the flock of mainstream Skylake chips has been released. So expect to see it in Q3 or Q4 or 2015.
The new enthusiast chipset for SKylake is dubbed Z170. It maintains dual channel memory support with up to four dims in total. Z170 will also support a whopping number of USB ports. 14 in total, 10 of which are USB 3.0 and 4 are USB 2.0. USB 3.1 support is still missing unfortunately, so board makers will have to resort to using their own controllers if they want to enable it.
The Z170 chipset will also support six SATA 6Gbps ports and 20 lanes of PCI express connectivity. Z170 boards will also feature three SATA Express x2 interfaces in addition to four M.2 interfaces. mSATA will not make a reteurn in Z170.

Ler a noticia completa em:
http://wccftech.com/intel-skylake-socket-lga-1151-z170-chipset/

[Jorge-Vieira]

Intel speeds-up introduction of unlocked Core i5/i7 ‘Broadwell’ processors

Intel Corp. has pulled-in introduction of its next-generation mainstream enthusiast-class microprocessors code-named “Broadwell-Unlocked” and “Broadwell-K” by several months, according to a slide the chip giant allegedly demonstrated to its partners earlier this week. The slide also confirms that Intel plans to introduce its code-named “Skylake-S” microprocessors for desktops already in the first half of next year.
Intel’s new Core i7 and Core i5 “Broadwell Unlocked” microprocessors with unlocked multipliers in LGA1150 packaging compatible with existing platforms based on Intel 9-series chipsets are to be introduced already in the second quarter of 2015, according to a slide that Intel showed at its technology conference for partners in Athens, Greece. Slides from the presentation were published by a member of AnandTech forums on Wednesday.
Previously it was expected that Intel’s high-performance desktop chips based on the “Broadwell” micro-architecture would be launched in July, August or September, 2015. Apparently, the company has managed to pull-in introduction of its new chips by several months.

The most advanced versions of Intel “Broadwell” microprocessors for client PCs will feature up to four x86 cores with the Hyper-Threading technology, Iris Pro graphics processors with up to 48 execution units, up to 8MB of last level cache (LLC), up to 128MB of high-speed eDRAM off-die cache, dual-channel DDR3 memory controllers and so on. The “Broadwell” family of central processing units is made using 14nm fabrication process.
In a bid to offer performance improvement over existing Core i7-4790K “Devil’s Canyon” microprocessor (four cores with HT, 4GHz, 8MB LLC), the alleged Core i7-5770K “Broadwell Unlocked” will have to run at a frequency that is higher than 4GHz.

Ver o resto da noticia em:
http://www.kitguru.net/components/cp...ll-processors/

[Jorge-Vieira]

Review Intel Core i7 5930K

Intel reasserted control of the high-end desktop space when it released the Haswell-E trio of processors at the back end of August. As the architecture name connotes, Intel has moved its entire premium desktop offerings to the Haswell architecture. Topping this trio is the Core i7-5960X - an eight-core, 16-thread beastie - followed by the Core i7-5930K and Core i7-5820K, both of which use the same six-core, 12-thread topology found in previous Extreme chips.
Applications able to take full advantage of the Haswell-E architecture benefit hugely from the increased processing count; Core i7-5960X has no performance peer. The performance angle is murkier when looking at the two other processors, because their muscle has been replicated before.
Let's take a quick peek to see how these extreme chips line-up.

High-End Desktop Models
Model	Cores / Threads	CPU Clock (GHz)	Turbo Boost (GHz)	Process	Die Size	Cache	PCIe lanes	IGP	DDR Support (MHz)	TDP	Launch Price (US 1ku)
Haswell Extreme Core Processor Family (4th Generation, LGA2011-v3)
Core i7-5960X	8 / 16	3.0	3.5	22nm	355mm²	20MB	40	N/A	Quad DDR4-2,133	140W	$999
Core i7-5930K	6 / 12	3.5	3.7	22nm	355mm²	15MB	40	N/A	Quad DDR4-2,133	140W	$583
Core i7-5820K	6 / 12	3.3	3.6	22nm	355mm²	15MB	28	N/A	Quad DDR4-2,133	140W	$389
Ivy Bridge Extreme Core Processor Family (3nd Generation, LGA2011)
Core i7-4960X	6 / 12	3.6	4.0	22nm	257mm²	15MB	40	N/A	Quad DDR3-1,866	130W	$990
Core i7-4930K	6 / 12	3.4	3.9	22nm	257mm²	12MB	40	N/A	Quad DDR3-1,866	130W	$555
Core i7-4820K	4 / 8	3.7	3.9	22nm	257mm²	10MB	40	N/A	Quad DDR3-1,866	130W	$310
Sandy Bridge Extreme Core Processor Family (2nd Generation, LGA2011)
Core i7-3970X	6 / 12	3.5	4.0	32nm	434mm²	15MB	40	N/A	Quad DDR3-1,600	150W	$999
Haswell Core Processor Family (4th Generation, LGA1150)
Core i7-4790K	4 / 8	4.0	4.4	22nm	177mm²	8MB	16	HD 4600	Dual DDR3-1,600	84W	$339
Ivy Bridge Core Processor Family (3rd Generation, LGA1155)
Core i7-3770K	4 / 8	3.5	3.9	22nm	160mm²	8MB	16	HD 4000	Dual DDR3-1,600	77W	$313

Core i7-5930K

Focussing on today's review of the Core i7-5930K, priced at $583 (£425), Intel is largely mirroring the absolute best processors of yesterday. Six cores and 12 threads on the Haswell architecture, clocked in at reasonable speeds and faster than the Core i7-5960X in this regard, provides stern competition for the Ivy Bridge Core i7-4960X and Sandy Bridge Core i7-3970X.

Ver a review toda:
http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/76...-22nm-haswell/

[Jorge-Vieira]

Haswell-E Overclocked: Real world power to performance testing

While we’ve seen the incredible power consumption that Intel’s Haswell-E Core i7 processors are capable of when overclocked, benchmark numbers are generally produced in a vacuum of sorts; at maximum load, how much power can the Core i7-5960X draw? Today we’re going to look at it from a more practical perspective: under a series of tests, how much power does the Core i7-5960X draw? And what do you get for it?
Our testing was done on the following system:

• CPU: Intel Core i7-5960X
• Motherboard: ASUS X99-DELUXE with 0904 BIOS
• DRAM: 4x8GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR4-2666
• Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
• Power Supply: Corsair AX1200i
• CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H100i with push-pull SP120 fans
• Storage: 128GB and 256GB Force LX SSDs

These were the voltages required to hit each speed bin in our initial tests:

Ver o artigo todo em:
http://www.techspot.com/news/58734-h...e-testing.html

[LPC]

Haswell-E Overclocked: Real world power to performance testing




Ver o artigo todo em:
http://www.techspot.com/news/58734-h...e-testing.html

Boas!
Esse artigo bate certinho com a experiência que eu tenho tido com os Haswell-E.
1.300v é necessário para fazer os 4.4ghz. E escusado será dizer que o salto em consumo e calor é semelhante ao que eu tinha com o FX8350 a 1.500v.

Tem-se poder de processamento mas também tem que se ter já um bom cooler para isto...
No entanto á que pensar um pouco nisto...

"There just isn’t anything to be gained in efficiency by overclocking your CPU in these games. Intel’s clock speed control is smart enough to be able to only give them what they need, though, and that minimizes the increases in power consumption. BioShock Infinite and Tomb Raider both only go up 50W in average power when you push the i7-5960X from stock to 4.4GHz; contrast that against Handbrake, which increases by a staggering 120W. If you stick to our 3.9GHz sweet spot, you’ll only see a 20-30W increase.
What can we conclude from all of this data? In most tasks, overclocking doesn’t tremendously impact Haswell-E’s efficiency. Most tasks. If you’re only planning on playing games, this CPU is beyond overkill and shouldn’t even be a consideration; it’s gross overkill even at stock speed. If you’re doing video or multimedia work, though, and power consumption and heat are considerations, I’d probably overclock up to about 3.9GHz. I hate that it’s not a round 4GHz, but 3.9GHz really seems to be the sweet spot on all of the processors we tested."


Consegue-se grandes voltagens e temperaturas a 3.9ghz, ainda ei de testar aqui a ver...
Como é dito o OC a altas resoluções nos jogos pouco ou nada faz, pois mesmo em default o sistema já é overkill para qualquer jogo ou aplicação...

Cumprimentos,

LPC

[reiszink]

O meu faz 4.7Ghz com 1.30v estável, mas pronto, é sabido que tive sorte. E além disso, um 5820K é diferente do 5960X.

De resto, bate tudo certo, são CPUs completamente exagerados para jogar, não noto ganhos relevantes em nenhum jogo com OC neste CPU. Por isso, até tenho andado com ele a stock, só coloco OC quando quero fazer algum bench.

Mas também é verdade que nunca tive os jogos tão fluidos como agora, o BF4 parece manteiga, não há um break, um slowdown, nada. O jogo estica bem as pernas neste CPU.