Registar

User Tag List

Likes Likes:  13
Página 107 de 127 PrimeiroPrimeiro ... 75797105106107108109117 ... ÚltimoÚltimo
Resultados 1,591 a 1,605 de 1893
  1. #1591
    Tech Veterano Avatar de MTPS
    Registo
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,921
    Likes (Dados)
    11
    Likes (Recebidos)
    26
    Avaliação
    6 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Citação Post Original de Winjer Ver Post
    Isto vai ser muito interessante quando estiver implementado nas BIOS. Poder ter 3 ou 4 cores a 4.5 GHz "base", é excelente!

  2. #1592
    Tech Veterano Avatar de MTPS
    Registo
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,921
    Likes (Dados)
    11
    Likes (Recebidos)
    26
    Avaliação
    6 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comment...mmend_massive/



    Começam-se a ver resultados interessantes com o OC por core. 6c a 4.5 GHz...

  3. #1593
    Tech Mestre Avatar de SleepyFilipy
    Registo
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,972
    Likes (Dados)
    13
    Likes (Recebidos)
    19
    Avaliação
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bem porreiro.

    Por este andar, daqui a um ano, vai ser só espetar um 3000 e um GPU atualizado mid range no PC, e siga.
    Dell G15

  4. #1594
    Tech Veterano Avatar de MTPS
    Registo
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,921
    Likes (Dados)
    11
    Likes (Recebidos)
    26
    Avaliação
    6 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Parece que mesmo no PS os Ryzen se portam bem:


  5. #1595
    Tech Veterano Avatar de MTPS
    Registo
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,921
    Likes (Dados)
    11
    Likes (Recebidos)
    26
    Avaliação
    6 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  6. #1596
    Moderador Avatar de Winjer
    Registo
    Feb 2013
    Local
    Santo Tirso
    Posts
    12,672
    Likes (Dados)
    30
    Likes (Recebidos)
    208
    Avaliação
    4 (100%)
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Este pessoal da Intel faz mais esforço a tentar aldrabar os consumidores, do que a fazer novos CPUS...

  7. #1597
    Moderador Avatar de Winjer
    Registo
    Feb 2013
    Local
    Santo Tirso
    Posts
    12,672
    Likes (Dados)
    30
    Likes (Recebidos)
    208
    Avaliação
    4 (100%)
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  8. #1598
    Moderador Avatar de Winjer
    Registo
    Feb 2013
    Local
    Santo Tirso
    Posts
    12,672
    Likes (Dados)
    30
    Likes (Recebidos)
    208
    Avaliação
    4 (100%)
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    DRAM Calculator for Ryzen v1.6.1

    Changelog 1.6.1:



    • Added full support for Zen 2 and X570 motherboards.
    • Added recommendations for VDDG and FCLK for Zen 2.
    • Added recommendations for Vref (CHA / CHB).
    • The maximum frequency for 1:1 mode is now 3800 MHz, and for 2:1 mode - 4200.
    • Updated presets for Samsung b-die, Hynix CJR and Micron e-die.
    • Added backward compatibility of Zen 2 with previous generations of motherboards.
    • Added PMU Training recommendations for all Ryzen platforms. Better training - a more stable system.
    • Added autosave of the main tab settings when closing the program and automatically loading them when the program is started.
    • Improved tWRRD prediction for Dual Rank.
    • Color notification of voltage limits and FCLK. Black is the norm, red is the limit.
    • Timing detection for Zen and Zen + generations. For the generation Zen 2 at the moment there is no possibility to add a definition of timings due to NDA. Unfortunately.
    • Fixed a lack of presets for X399.
    • Fixed a rare error in which it was impossible to calculate the timings.
    • Added a button to access the Internet overclocking statistics generation Zen 2.
    • For users of Intel systems in the “Additional Calculators” section, it is possible to calculate tREFI and RTL IO-L.
    • Added 2 new latency tests for MEMbench. Custom latency is a memory access test that the processor cannot predict (using a specific offset). Random latency - the average time is measured for random memory accesses in a buffer of a certain size. Partially affects the result of TLB. Both versions are release candidates, but I do not deny that there will be calibrations.
    • Custom latency and Random latency are included in the Easy and Default packages. Please note that during testing the program will open / close the prompt itself (you do not need to deal with it).
    • Added information about the size of the L3 cache processor. Also, the size of the test blocks for latency tests is controlled relative to it.
    • Added button Clear standby. There is to clean the cached memory by the operating system. Didn't the test run? - Click Clear standby.
    • Max RAM button better determines the amount of free memory available for testing. Useful for checking memory for errors.
    • There are exceptions for many functions. Fault tolerance of the program increased.
    • Graphic edits.

  9. #1599
    Tech Veterano Avatar de MTPS
    Registo
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,921
    Likes (Dados)
    11
    Likes (Recebidos)
    26
    Avaliação
    6 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)


    4466 MHz...

    Longe vão os tempos do B-die para 3200 MHz...

    MEANWHILE on the DARKSIDE:



    Antes do Ryzen 1xxx/Zen1 para a pontuação do userbenchmark:
    1 core 30%
    4 cores 50%
    multi core: 20%

    Depois de saírem os Zen1/Ryzen 1xxx alteraram para:
    1 core 30%
    4 cores 60%
    multi core: 10%

    Agora saiu o Zen2/Ryzen 3xxx, mudaram para:
    1 core 40%,
    4 cores 58%,
    multi core 2%.

    20% para 2% do MT...!

    BACK TO 2000! 1 core is the FUTURE!


    COINCIDÊNCIAS CLARO!

  10. #1600
    Moderador Avatar de Winjer
    Registo
    Feb 2013
    Local
    Santo Tirso
    Posts
    12,672
    Likes (Dados)
    30
    Likes (Recebidos)
    208
    Avaliação
    4 (100%)
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    AMD Ryzen CPU Gain A Mammoth Market Share Versus Intel’s Core Lineup – Ryzen 3000 Outselling Intel 4 to 1, Ryzen 7 3700X Sales Eat Up Intel’s Entire Lineup

    "The latest market share and revenue report for AMD Ryzen and Intel Core processors are in from Mindfactory (via Ingebor) and it looks like the red team has got a major win on their hands. Based on the figures from Germany’s biggest retail outlet, the report shows that AMD while consistently topping Intel for an entire year has now surpassed them with an unimaginable and record share.

    It has been almost a month since the Ryzen 3000 series processors launched. The processors hit the market on 7th of July and so only 23 days have passed since their arrival on retail shelves yet Intel’s worst nightmare has come true. AMD not only crushed their rival with a market share of 79 percent but the recorded figure was also the highest in a year for the red team. Intel, on the other hand, managed the smallest market share in over a year at just 21%.

    Running down the sales figures in details, AMD’s recorded share of CPU sold at 79% was even bigger than the first generation Ryzen and second-generation Ryzen launch. Of the AMD Ryzen 3000 series CPUs sold, the Ryzen 7 3700X was the most popular and the chip alone sold almost as much as Intel’s entire Core lineup. The Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 2600 followed up and the reason was due to the incredible value that the 6 core chips offer plus the amazing discounts on the Ryzen 5 2600, putting the chip under the $150 US range.

    The Ryzen 9 3900X sold higher quantities than Intel’s flagship Core i9-9900K since it offers more cores and multi-tasking performance than the 9th Gen Intel offering. The Ryzen 7 3800X was the least popular Ryzen 3000 series part but that’s to be expected since you’re getting almost the same amount of performance on the 8 core Ryzen 7 3700X for a much better price point.

    When it comes to revenue from the sales, AMD managed to grab the most share at 75% while Intel had a 25% share in July. The most revenue came from Ryzen 7 3700X because it also sold the most quantities while Ryzen 9 3900X came out second. While the Ryzen 9 3900X didn’t sell as much as the Ryzen 7 3700X, it does cost a higher $499 US price tag which reported for higher revenue. The AMD Ryzen 3000 CPUs are also facing minor shortages in select regions due to their immense popularity, however, the average sales price of AMD CPUs has seen an increase of a whopping 50% during the launch month which is impressive.

    Lastly, we can see the share split between Intel’s and AMD’s lineup. 50% of the AMD CPUs sold were Mattise or Ryzen 3000 series based, 32% were Pinnacle Ridge-based, 5% were Summit Ridge-based while the remaining 3% were Threadripper HEDT CPUs and APUs. Intel’s share included 70 percent Coffee Lake Refresh or 9th Gen CPUs, 27% Coffee Lake or 8th Gen CPUs, and the rest of the 3% were Skylake-X and Kaby Lake 7th Gen CPUs.

    In the end, all I want to say is that this news is absolutely fantastic for AMD and it shows that more consumers are replacing Intel CPUs with newer Ryzen processors that offer better features and a lot more multitasking performance while delivering single-core performance on par with the rival Intel chips. AMD has completely demolished Intel and with the Ryzen 3000 victory, Intel is more or less ‘Outside’ of the leaders camp."

  11. #1601
    Tech Veterano Avatar de MTPS
    Registo
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,921
    Likes (Dados)
    11
    Likes (Recebidos)
    26
    Avaliação
    6 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Os Ryzen 2 são cpus bombásticos. Mas...eu não estava preparado para ver o que são os EPYC Rome.

    Devastam por completo as soluções Intel, a custarem menos e com consumos que fazem uma troca rentabilizada em meses.

    Incrível...
    Última edição de MTPS : 09-08-19 às 20:47

  12. #1602
    Moderador Avatar de Winjer
    Registo
    Feb 2013
    Local
    Santo Tirso
    Posts
    12,672
    Likes (Dados)
    30
    Likes (Recebidos)
    208
    Avaliação
    4 (100%)
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sim, os Rome da AMD rebemtam por completo com a Intel.
    Há uns anos atrás, alguém iria adivinhar uma coisa destas?!












    https://www.anandtech.com/print/1469...e-epyc-2nd-gen

  13. #1603
    Tech Veterano Avatar de MTPS
    Registo
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    6,921
    Likes (Dados)
    11
    Likes (Recebidos)
    26
    Avaliação
    6 (100%)
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Penso que este será o melhor lançamento de sempre da AMD.

  14. #1604
    Moderador Avatar de Winjer
    Registo
    Feb 2013
    Local
    Santo Tirso
    Posts
    12,672
    Likes (Dados)
    30
    Likes (Recebidos)
    208
    Avaliação
    4 (100%)
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    AMD Stock Taking In a Big Upwards Trend 16% added value after Epyc Rome announcements

    AMD is smiling again (as they should). It appears that they have left that negative spiral behind them. AMD now passed 34 USD which is a near 85% increase in value seen from a year ago. The new ZEN2 products are paying off and have been well received in the market.
    Last week they introduced 64-core Epyc Rome products for the data-center, and that again was very well received in the market, both Google and Twitter announced that they would use the new generation of processors in their own servers. Patrick Moorhead, founder, president and chief analyst at Moors Insights & Strategy, indicates that AMD can play a primary role in this market for a long time due to the delay of a 10nm production process at competitor Intel (for the server market).


  15. #1605
    Moderador Avatar de Winjer
    Registo
    Feb 2013
    Local
    Santo Tirso
    Posts
    12,672
    Likes (Dados)
    30
    Likes (Recebidos)
    208
    Avaliação
    4 (100%)
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    AMD AGESA 1.0.0.3ABBA That Apparently Fixes Zen2 Boost Issues Leaked

    AMD is giving final touches to an AGESA microcode update that fixes the issue of underwhelming Precision Boost behavior on its 3rd generation Ryzen processors. Version ComboAM4 1.0.0.3ABBA is being pushed to motherboard manufacturers to integrate with their UEFI firmware, and one such dispatch to MSI got leaked to the web on ChipHell. Tom's Hardware grabbed the BIOS as it was compatible with the MEG X570 Creator motherboard they have, and tested the Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 3700X with it.

    In its testing, posted in a mini-review article, Tom's Hardware observed that with AGESA 1.0.0.3ABBA, their 3700X sample was correctly hitting 4.40 GHz across the board at stock settings. With the older 1.0.0.3AB, it would touch 4.375 GHz. The Ryzen 9 3900X behaves slightly differently with this microcode. Tom's Hardware was able to raise its peak boost frequency from 4.575 GHz to 4.625 GHz (above the 4.60 GHz specification), but in certain tests such as POV-Ray and CineBench, its boost frequency decays down to 4.250 GHz. Overall, the reviewer tabulated improved performance on the chips with the new microcode. The new microcode also apparently changes the processor's thermal thresholds.
    Esta nova BIOS já está disponivel para a maior parte de motherboards, incluindo as X370 e B350.

 

 
Página 107 de 127 PrimeiroPrimeiro ... 75797105106107108109117 ... ÚltimoÚltimo

Informação da Thread

Users Browsing this Thread

Estão neste momento 7 users a ver esta thread. (0 membros e 7 visitantes)

Bookmarks

Regras

  • Você Não Poderá criar novos Tópicos
  • Você Não Poderá colocar Respostas
  • Você Não Poderá colocar Anexos
  • Você Não Pode Editar os seus Posts
  •